Class Action News
- Class Action Lawsuit Says Lumber Liquidators Sold Illegally Sourced Toxic Wood
- Volkswagen Escapes Jetta Lock Defect Class Action Lawsuit
- Kay Jewelers Faces Class Action Lawsuit from Blind Customers
- Fisher-Price Rock ‘N Play Mold Growth Class Action Lawsuit
- PVC Decking Companies Want Class Action Lawsuit Dismissed
Drug Lawsuit News
- Parents Sue Pfizer Over Alleged Zoloft Birth Defects
- Ind. Couple Sue Stryker for Metal-on-Metal Hip Injuries
- Mentor Worldwide, Coloplast Hit with New Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit
- Lawsuit Alleges NuvaRing Manufacturer Downplayed Risks, Endangered Consumers
- Fla. Man Files Pradaxa Lawsuit after Suffering Uncontrollable Bleeding
|Judge Approves TurboTax Class Action Lawsuit Settlement|
- Monday, 07 October 2013 08:33
Judge Approves TurboTax Class Action Lawsuit Settlement
By Anne Bucher
A California federal judge has granted final approval to a $6.55 million class action lawsuit settlement resolving claims that Intuit’s free TurboTax edition included exorbitantly high interest rates.
Arkansas residents Tasha and Fredierick Smith filed the TurboTax class action lawsuit in February of last year, claiming that Intuit violates the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and California business and usury laws. They alleged that the “free” online edition of TurboTax charges illegal and outrageously high fees to consumers who choose to defer their TurboTax fees, opting instead to have the fees deducted from their tax refund.
In their class action lawsuit, the Smiths claim that the TurboTax webpage presents users with a variety of TurboTax products, including the so-called “Free Edition.” However, this edition of the software is not free because it charges $19.95 to file a state tax return. They allege that the “Free Edition” of TurboTax costs nothing unless a user wants to “file, e-file, or print your return,” in which case the user must purchase TurboTax federal and state products.
The plaintiffs claim that they had used TurboTax in 2009, 2010 and 2011. Each time, they deferred the $86.90 fee to use the software, opting to have the amount deducted from their tax refund. Allegedly, Intuit charged them $29.95 to have the fee deducted from their refund, more than 34 percent of the original usage fee. The Smiths claimed that Intuit failed to adequately disclose the fee for the “refund processing service” as a finance charge.
Initially, the plaintiffs argued that the $29.95 should be considered a refund anticipation loan and therefore should be subject to interest rate and finance charge disclosure rules. However, U.S. District Judge Edward J. Davila disagreed and dismissed this claim because TurboTax users never received any money from Intuit. Subsequently, the parties agreed to settle the class action lawsuit. Intuit has denied any wrongdoing but agreed to refund consumers under the terms of the class action settlement.
Earlier this year, Judge Davila granted preliminary approval to the Intuit TurboTax class action settlement. After a fairness hearing was held on September 27, Judge Davila granted final approval to the class action settlement on October 1. Class Members include anyone who used Intuit’s TurboTax online and utilized the “refund processing service” from January 12, 2008 until May 28, 2013. The agreement will incorporate a second class action lawsuit that is currently pending against Intuit in state court.
To be eligible to receive a cash award from the class action settlement, Class Members must submit a valid Claim Form to the Settlement Administrator on or before October 28, 2013.
Detailed instructions on how to file a claim for the TurboTax class action settlement can be found here in our Open Class Action Lawsuits section.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs include Hank Bates of Carney Williams Bates Pulliam & Bowman PLLC; Gillian Wade and Isaac Miller of Milstein Adelman LLP; Richard M. Golomb, Ruben Honik and Kenneth J. Grunfeld of Golomb & Honik PC; and Brian T. Ku and M. Ryan Casey of Ku & Mussman PA.
The TurboTax Class Action Lawsuit Settlement case is Smith v. Intuit Inc., Case No. 12-cv-00222, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Last Updated on Monday, 07 October 2013 08:35